Paperback $6.99

It is often amusing to catch "science" out in its pompous parade of authority and gadgetry, and often amazing that some fields are not arrested for "false pretenses.

Amongst those present in this parade is the modern "biologist" with his modern "Man from Mud" theory. According to the professors in this "field," man is an animal who arose as a result of a spontaneous accident from a "sea of ammonia" and by the stages of development called "evolution," arrived at the proud estate of a two-legged wog. This is the theory taught as the theory in.
most universities today.

Subjects Covered

So to those who resent people calling Scientology theory to account as "wild," look at that "Man from Mud theory, a backbone of biology, psychology and psychiatry to name a few. It is excruciatingly funny.

The idea of an "accidental" "combination of chemicals" coming alive, in all places, in a "sea of ammonia" and then evolving into a thinking being of the complexity of man is more ridiculous than a Joe Miller joke book.

Yet the bearded ones will viciously flunk a student who dares to disagree. Biology means "life science" and is nothing of the sort by its own practice. It is at best "cytology," a science dealing with body and vegetable cells as it is a subject entirely devoted to cells, not to life as everyone else thinks of it. So even its name is false.

And on the subject of false names, modern "psychology," using "biology" as its excuse for fixation on brains, dares pre-empts the word "psychology". This means "soul, study of" (psyche = soul). But in their classrooms all they study is brains. They think that as man arose in a sea of ammonia by spontaneous combustion, they therefore have to concentrate on brain cells, feed them chemicals or cut them up to get at life. They are not psyche-ologists at all ' but at best "brainologists." If you ask one to define "psychology" as a word he says (and so do his texts) that he doesn't know what his science title means. This stops him right there. So he is a fake. That's why he loves to call everyone else a "fake". He knows he is one. He didn't even know IQ could change until we came along. "Man's IQ never changes" says his pre-Dianetic texts. After she read Dianetics, a psychologist in the late 1950's got a national prize for saying IQ changed. She couldn't change it but she said it changed. Afterwards universities got even with us by saying IQ didn't exist. As this was about all a psychologist did-measure IQ (and study rats)?they wiped themselves out as a profession.

Psychiatry has to get at brains with shock, knives, ice picks because as man came from mud as a cell, the think cell must be what makes him go mad so if one cuts or damages it the "cells that think" then man will become sane. Doing these inhuman crimes, their statistic of insanity has risen like a rocket. Yet they never question for a moment the basic theory on which they "operate" despite no gains in their "profession" ?and do a great deal of harm. So that's where the "Man from Mud theory took them!

In Scientology we raise IQ easily and do all sorts of things that used to be called miracles solely because we know man is a spiritual being inhabiting a flesh body. We don't worry about the cells because man isn't one. So we get results. Because we operate on truth and don't indulge in popular theories just because Priest Scientist says some lie in a loud university chant slavishly quoted by the newspapers!

We are not popular with the old witch doctors-the biologists, psychologists and psychiatrists because as we go on we show them up as frauds.

Our truths speak far louder then their curses. And our results prove our truths.

If we succeed fully, they will be looked on by one and all as humbugs. And to their already colorful crimes they have added the crime of seeking by libel and slander to suppress truth. Such people seldom prosper.

But about this "Man from Mud" theory, where did it come from? What great Einstein of biology burped it up?

Why, no great Einstein of biology or psychology or psychiatry ever had any part in the origin of the "Man from Mud theory.

Far from having come from "science" the "Man from Mud" theory was taken by these scientists from a body of religious demonology and foisted off on man as "modern thought," what you'd expect from fakes.

What religious demonology? Why the Egyptian, of course. In the Larousse

Encyclopaedia of Mythology, the standard work, we find in column 4 page 11

under "Divinities attached to the ennead of Heliopolis and the family of Osiris" the following paragraph:

"Nun (or Nu) is chaos, the primordial ocean in which before the creation lay the germs of all things and all beings."

These "scientific" pots who are calling everyone fakes, might have done a

bit better than to try to foist off on the world mere religious superstition as the scientific basis on which all their whole "science" is laid. Man from mud?

The only mud connected with man is the mud slung by pompous fakes trying, to defend the hopeless cause of keeping man in ignorance of the truth.

These are the fellows who call Scientology theory "wild" and "science fiction." At least we're more modern than the earliest religious demonology of Egypt!

How can one take such people seriously?

L. RON HUBBARD